data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6062/b60624f5dc23c056c72d1f6239b302c27ac07dde" alt=""
McCain started it, talking about how Obama is a celebrity. You may remember his ad and the subsequent rebuttal by Paris Hilton.
Now, if my former colleague and his current colleagues are to be believed, the Obama campaign was a little worried pre-speech about Obama's celebrity, too.
Wait, why?
This is America.
We love celebrities.
You may remember Ronald Reagan, for example. Or, like, Arnold Schwarzenegger (both elected by the great state of California, where one eighth of Americans live). Jesse Ventura. Sonny Bono. Gopher. Cooter.
Celebrities rule.
As I was discussing this with a friend (who proudly subscribes to People magazine), she reminded me that the whole idea was "to show lack of substance." And she's right, but.
But we love lack of substance. Love, love, love it. See most of the people mentioned above.
We like popular.
I mean, by definition, since that is what popular means.
So — what's the drawback to Obama being a "celebrity?"
I am sure there's something here I'm not getting.